Pilotage d’entreprise

Small teams, big results

For years, the sheer size of a company’s workforce was often seen as the ultimate badge of honor, a clear signal of success. The bigger the headcount, the more impressive the achievement.

But as we stand in 2025, amidst the revolutionary wave of artificial intelligence and the rise of lean startups, that narrative has fundamentally shifted.

The focus is no longer on how many people you employ, but on how much a small, agile team can accomplish.

This isn’t merely about cutting costs; it’s a complete paradigm shift in how companies are built and what success truly looks like. We’re entering the age of the tiny team: lean, focused, and incredibly impactful. The question for anyone embarking on an innovative project today is, are you ready for it?

The New Formula: Small Teams, Big Results

Gone are the days when growth was exclusively measured in employees. Today, the metric that truly matters is productivity per person.

Consider the example of Gamma, a company that serves 50 million users with a mere 28 employees, has raised $23M, and has been profitable for over 15 months.

This isn’t magic; it’s leverage. Each team member is a generalist, empowered by powerful AI tools, operating without the traditional silos or managerial bloat.

This clear, high-output execution is rapidly becoming the blueprint for success.

Why Big Teams are now a Red Flag

Where investors once applauded a large headcount, they now scrutinize it.

A bulky team often signals inefficiency, outdated thinking, and a resistance to the rapid changes demanded by today’s landscape.

We’re on the cusp of a world where zero-employee, billion-dollar companies are no longer a fantasy.

Today’s venture capitalists are actively seeking speed, adaptability, and leverage.

They aren’t interested in funding cumbersome organizations. They want focused operators equipped with the right tools, not suffocated by hierarchies.

You no longer need a team of data analysts; you need someone adept at prompting GPT.

You don’t need ten marketers; you need one who deeply understands growth strategies and automation.

Flexibility over Rigid Structures, embracing FLUX

The traditional startup model often mirrored factory assembly lines: specialized roles, multiple layers of management, and rigid processes.

However, AI doesn’t conform to traditional organizational charts. It thrives on initiative, flexibility, and autonomy.

Companies like Gamma succeed because their team members are player-coaches – simultaneously executing tasks and leading their areas. This model champions agility and sound judgment over strict adherence to procedure.

For these tiny, innovative teams, frameworks like FLUX are particularly appropriate. FLUX, standing for Fast, Liquid, Uncharted, and eXperimental, encapsulates the very essence of what makes small teams thrive in today’s dynamic business environment.

Fast: Tiny teams, unburdened by bureaucracy, can move with incredible speed, making rapid decisions and executing quickly. This aligns perfectly with the « Fast » principle of FLUX, emphasizing quick adaptation and responsiveness.
Liquid: Small teams are inherently more adaptable and less rigid than large organizations. They can easily reconfigure, pivot, and flow with changing market demands, embodying the « Liquid » aspect of the framework.
Uncharted: Innovative projects often venture into unknown territories. Tiny teams are better equipped to navigate these « Uncharted » waters, as they can collectively explore, learn, and iterate without the complexity of coordinating numerous stakeholders.
eXperimental: The lean nature of tiny teams fosters a culture of continuous experimentation and learning from failures, which is core to the « eXperimental » principle of FLUX. This allows them to rapidly test hypotheses and discover effective solutions.

By embracing the FLUX framework, tiny teams naturally cultivate the agility, collaboration, continuous learning, and forward-thinking mindset necessary to not just survive but truly thrive amidst constant change.

The strategic edge of tiny teams

Founders of innovative projects should actively resist the temptation of early bloat. Staying small for as long as possible offers a significant competitive advantage. Why?

Speed: Small teams move faster, with less friction.
Focus: Alignment is easier. Distractions are fewer.
Tool Leverage: AI tools empower fewer people to accomplish far more.
Resilience: Generalists can cover multiple roles when needed.
Efficiency: Lean teams use capital wisely, something investors value more than ever.

What investors prioritize in 2025

The venture capital mindset has undergone a profound transformation. The « scale-at-all-costs » mentality is out. Instead, investors are asking:

How much can this team achieve before they need to expand?
How efficient are they per person, per euro, per hour?
Are they obsessed with their product or their organizational structure?

Impact per head is the new north star.

The One-Person Startup: A future closer than you think

While we celebrate small teams today, tomorrow we might be applauding solo founders building entire companies from their laptops – not just hobby projects, but legitimate, investor-backed businesses. This isn’t science fiction. With the explosive pace of AI development, it’s already possible to:

Build and launch software without writing a single line of code.
Generate content, manage marketing campaigns, and handle customer support.
Oversee operations, analyze data, and conduct UX testing – all solo.

Soon, one person will effectively replace ten. Eventually, perhaps none will be needed for many tasks.

What this means for your innovative and organic project

If you’re launching an innovative project in 2025, it’s time to ask yourself some critical questions:

Am I hiring to look impressive, or because there’s a genuine, indispensable need for the help?
Can the combination of AI and highly capable generalists outperform the larger team I initially envisioned?
Am I chasing vanity metrics, or am I focused on achieving real, impactful traction?

In today’s landscape, you don’t win by being big. You win by being lean, fast, and remarkably sharp.

L’Importance des Matrices de Simple et Double Matérialité dans la Gestion d’Entreprise

Dans un monde en constante évolution, les entreprises doivent repenser leurs pratiques de gestion. Traditionnellement, la plupart des dirigeants se concentraient sur les indicateurs financiers pour évaluer la performance de leur entreprise.

Cependant, cette approche peut limiter la vision stratégique et la durabilité de l’organisation.

C’est ici qu’interviennent les matrices de simple et double matérialité, des outils essentiels pour piloter une entreprise de manière plus holistique.

Qu’est-ce que la Simple et la Double Matérialité ?

Matrice de Simple Matérialité

La simple matérialité se concentre sur les enjeux qui ont un impact direct sur la performance financière de l’entreprise. Cela inclut des aspects comme les coûts opérationnels, les flux de trésorerie et la rentabilité. En d’autres termes, cette matrice permet aux entreprises de se concentrer sur les facteurs qui influencent immédiatement leur ligne du bas.

Matrice de Double Matérialité

La double matérialité élargit cette perspective en prenant également en compte l’impact des activités de l’entreprise sur la société et l’environnement. Cela signifie que les entreprises doivent considérer non seulement comment les enjeux environnementaux et sociaux affectent leur performance, mais aussi comment leurs opérations influencent ces enjeux. Par exemple, une entreprise qui réduit ses émissions de carbone peut non seulement améliorer son image de marque, mais aussi se préparer à des régulations futures qui pourraient impacter ses coûts.

Pourquoi changer d’habitude ?

1. Anticipation des risques

En intégrant la double matérialité, les entreprises peuvent mieux anticiper les risques associés aux enjeux environnementaux et sociaux. Par exemple, les changements climatiques peuvent affecter les chaînes d’approvisionnement. Une entreprise qui ne prend pas en compte ces facteurs peut faire face à des interruptions de production, des coûts accrus et des pertes de revenus.

2. Création de valeur à long terme

Regarder au-delà des indicateurs financiers permet de créer de la valeur sur le long terme. Les entreprises qui adoptent des pratiques durables peuvent attirer des clients plus fidèles et des investisseurs soucieux de l’impact social et environnemental. Cela peut également conduire à des innovations qui améliorent l’efficacité et réduisent les coûts.

3. Conformité et réputation

Les régulations autour des enjeux environnementaux et sociaux se renforcent. En anticipant ces changements et en intégrant la double matérialité dans leur stratégie, les entreprises peuvent éviter des amendes coûteuses et améliorer leur réputation. Une bonne réputation peut se traduire par une fidélité accrue des clients et une attraction des talents.

4. Responsabilité Sociétale des Entreprises (RSE)

Les consommateurs et les employés d’aujourd’hui attendent des entreprises qu’elles prennent leurs responsabilités au sérieux. En adoptant une approche de double matérialité, les entreprises peuvent démontrer leur engagement envers la RSE. Cela peut renforcer la confiance du public et améliorer leur position sur le marché.

Changer d’habitude et adopter les matrices de simple et double matérialité permet aux entreprises de naviguer dans un environnement complexe et en constante évolution.

En élargissant leur perspective au-delà des simples indicateurs financiers, les dirigeants peuvent mieux anticiper les risques, créer de la valeur à long terme, améliorer leur réputation et répondre aux attentes croissantes de la société.

En fin de compte, cette approche holistique est non seulement bénéfique pour l’entreprise, mais aussi pour la planète et la société dans son ensemble. Je partage avec vous mon e-book pour aller plus loin sur ce sujet.